Yirmi Sekizinci Lem'a/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

Yirmi Sekizinci Lem'a/en (kaynağı gör)

10.04, 23 Eylül 2024 tarihindeki hâli

135 bayt eklendi , 23 Eylül

"Another subtle and meaningful ‘coincidence’ is this: the one hundred and twenty- eight parts of the Risale-i Nur are put together in one hundred and fifteen booklets. The number of days from when the Risale-i Nur students and its author were first arrested on 27th April, 1935 to the date on which the court passed judgement on 19th August, 1935 was one hundred and fifteen coinciding with the number of books of the Risale-i Nur. In addition, the one..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

GörselVikimetin

Ferhat

Bürokratlar, Arayüz yöneticileri, Push abonelik yöneticileri, Gözetmenler, Hizmetliler, translator

78.073

düzenleme

@@ 147. satır: / 147. satır: @@
 The ‘coincidence’(*<ref>*For ‘coincidence’ (tevâfuk), see, note 22, page 199. (Tr.)</ref>)of Article 163,(*<ref>*Article 163 of the Turkish Criminal Code. (Tr.)</ref>)under which the Risale-i Nur students were charged and sentenced, and the number of deputies, one hundred and sixty-three out of two hundred, who allotted one hundred and fifty thousand liras for the medrese(*<ref>*This refers to the Medresetü’z-Zehra. See, note 21, page 325. (Tr.)</ref>)of the  Risale-i Nur’s  author in effect says this: the appreciative  signatures of one hundred and sixty-three deputies of the government of the republic quashes the ruling of Article 163 of the Criminal Code concerning him.
-<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
+Another subtle and meaningful ‘coincidence’ is this: the one hundred and twenty- eight  parts of the Risale-i Nur are put together in one hundred and fifteen booklets. The number of  days from when the Risale-i Nur students and its author were first arrested on 27th April, 1935 to the date on which the court passed judgement on 19th August, 1935 was one hundred and fifteen coinciding with the number of books of the Risale-i Nur. In addition, the one hundred and fifteen people found guilty coincides with  the  number  exactly,  showing  that  the  calamity  visited  on  the  Risale-i  Nur students and its author is being regulated by a Hand of Favour.(*<ref>*It is worth noting that the arrests of some of the Risale-i Nur students started on 25 April 1935. Thus, because in the indictment one hundred and seventeen people were cited as guilty – the names of two of them had been repeated – the number shown for the students was one hundred and seventeen, this coincided with the one hundred and seventeen days from the date that group were arrested to the date of the court’s judgement, adding a further subtlety to the former ‘coincidence.’</ref>)
-Hem yine manidar tevafukat-ı latîfedendir ki Risale-i Nur’un 128 parçası, 115 parça kitap ediyor. Risale-i Nur’un şakirdlerinin ve müellifinin mebde-i tevkifi olan 27 Nisan 1935 tarihi ile mahkemenin karar ve hüküm tarihi olan 19 Ağustos 1935 tarihi olmasına nazaran, 115 gün olup Risale-i Nur kitapları adedine tevafuk etmekle beraber, istintak edilen 115 suçlu gösterilen eşhasın da adedine tam tamına tevafuk ettiği gibi gösteriyor ki: Risale-i Nur müellifinin ve şakirdlerinin başına gelen musibet, bir dest-i inayetle tanzim ediliyor. (Hâşiye<ref>'''Hâşiye:''' Cây-ı dikkattir ki Risale-i Nur şakirdlerinin tevkiflerinin bir kısmı 25 Nisan 1935 tarihinde başlamış olup, kararnamede suçlu gösterilen 117 kimse ise de ikisinin ismi mükerrer olmasına nazaran bu suretle şakirdlerin adedi 117 adedine o kısmın tevkifinden hüküm tarihine kadar 117 gün olmakla tevafuk edip evvelki tevafukata bir letafet daha katmıştır.</ref>)
-</div>