İçeriğe atla

On İkinci Şuâ/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

"'''In Short:''' As I stated before, I told Eskişehir Court when they wanted to convict me under Article 163: out of two hundred deputies of the Republican Government, the same number, 163, agreed to assign one hundred and fifty thousand liras to my medrese(*<ref>*See, page 483, footnote 69.</ref>)in Van. Due to this, the regard in which the Republican Government held me invalidates Article 163 as far as I am concerned. Although I told the court th..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu
("I present my defence, which is in the form of a petition I sent to the departments of government in Ankara and to the President, and the reply from the Prime Minister’s Office, which shows that they recognized its importance. Contained in this defence are decisive answers to the unfounded and offensive suspicions that the prosecution have stated against us. There are numerous untrue and illogical things in the report of the committee of experts from he..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
("'''In Short:''' As I stated before, I told Eskişehir Court when they wanted to convict me under Article 163: out of two hundred deputies of the Republican Government, the same number, 163, agreed to assign one hundred and fifty thousand liras to my medrese(*<ref>*See, page 483, footnote 69.</ref>)in Van. Due to this, the regard in which the Republican Government held me invalidates Article 163 as far as I am concerned. Although I told the court th..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
190. satır: 190. satır:
I present my defence, which is in the form of a petition I sent to the departments of government in Ankara and to the President, and the reply from the Prime Minister’s Office, which shows that they recognized its importance. Contained in this defence are decisive answers to the unfounded and offensive suspicions that the prosecution have stated against us. There are numerous untrue and illogical things in the report of the committee of experts from here,  which was based on the superficial and malicious reports of other places; my objections to these too have been presented.
I present my defence, which is in the form of a petition I sent to the departments of government in Ankara and to the President, and the reply from the Prime Minister’s Office, which shows that they recognized its importance. Contained in this defence are decisive answers to the unfounded and offensive suspicions that the prosecution have stated against us. There are numerous untrue and illogical things in the report of the committee of experts from here,  which was based on the superficial and malicious reports of other places; my objections to these too have been presented.


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
'''In Short:''' As I stated before, I told Eskişehir Court when they wanted to convict me under Article 163: out of two hundred deputies of the Republican Government, the same  number, 163, agreed to assign  one  hundred  and  fifty  thousand liras to my medrese(*<ref>*See, page 483, footnote 69.</ref>)in Van. Due to this, the regard in which the Republican Government held me invalidates Article 163 as far as I am concerned. Although I told the court this, the committee of experts corrupted  what  I  said  and  wrote: “163 deputies  opened proceedings against Said.” It is because of this totally baseless accusation of that first experts’ committee that the prosecution is making charges against us.
Size evvelce arz ettiğim gibi Eskişehir Mahkemesine, 163’üncü madde ile beni mahkûm etmek istedikleri zaman demiştim: Hükûmet-i cumhuriyenin iki yüz mebusu içinde aynı rakam 163 mebusun imzalarıyla Van’daki dârülfünunuma (medreseme) yüz elli bin banknot tahsisat kabul etmeleri ve onun ile hükûmet-i cumhuriyenin bana karşı teveccühü, bu 163’üncü maddeyi hakkımda hükümden ıskat ediyor, dediğim halde o ehl-i vukuf “163 mebus Said aleyhinde takibat yapmışlar.” diye tahrif etmiş.
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">