İçeriğe atla

Yirmi Üçüncü Mektup/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

Yirmi Üçüncü Mektup/en (kaynağı gör)

12.07, 28 Ekim 2024 tarihindeki hâli

190 bayt eklendi ,  28 Ekim 2024
"Since the phrase, “May God be pleased with him” is used for the Companions of the Prophet (UWBP), is it appropriate to use it in the same way for others?" içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu
GörselVikimetin
("The results of such acceptable prayers are either seen in this world exactly as requested, or they are accepted in respect of the eternal life in the hereafter of the one who offered them. That is to say, if what was sought does not occur exactly as wished, it should not be said that the prayer was not accepted,(*<ref>*Bukhari, Da’wat, 22; Muslim, Dhikr, 90-1.</ref>)but that it was accepted in a better form." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
("Since the phrase, “May God be pleased with him” is used for the Companions of the Prophet (UWBP), is it appropriate to use it in the same way for others?" içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
Etiketler: Mobil değişiklik Mobil ağ değişikliği
33. satır: 33. satır:
The results of such acceptable prayers are either seen in this world exactly as requested, or they are accepted in respect of the eternal life in the hereafter of the one who offered them. That is to say, if what was sought does not occur exactly as wished, it should not be said that the prayer was not accepted,(*<ref>*Bukhari, Da’wat, 22; Muslim, Dhikr, 90-1.</ref>)but that it was accepted in a better form.
The results of such acceptable prayers are either seen in this world exactly as requested, or they are accepted in respect of the eternal life in the hereafter of the one who offered them. That is to say, if what was sought does not occur exactly as wished, it should not be said that the prayer was not accepted,(*<ref>*Bukhari, Da’wat, 22; Muslim, Dhikr, 90-1.</ref>)but that it was accepted in a better form.


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<span id="İkinci_Sualiniz:"></span>
== İkinci Sualiniz: ==
==YOUR SECOND QUESTION==
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Since the phrase, “May God be pleased with him” is used for the Companions of the Prophet (UWBP), is it appropriate to use it in the same way for others?
Sahabe-i kiram hazeratına “radıyallahu anh” denildiğine binaen, başkalara da bu manada söylemek muvafık mıdır?
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
'''The Answer:'''Yes, it may be used, because unlike “Upon whom be blessings  and peace,” which is a mark of God’s Messenger (UWBP), the epithet, “May God be pleased with him” is not particular to the Companions, but should be used for persons who, like the Companions, attained to the “greater sainthood” known as “the legacy of prophethood,” rising to the station of God’s pleasure. Examples are the four Imams, and Shaikh ‘Abd  al-Qadir Gilani, Imam-i Rabbani (Shaikh Ahmad Sirhindi), and Imam Ghazali. But the general practice among religious scholars has been to use “May God be pleased with him” for the Companions; “May God have mercy on him” for the two generations succeeding them; “May God forgive him” for subsequent generations; and “May his mystery be sanctified” for the great saints.
'''Elcevap:''' Evet, denilir. Çünkü Resul-i Ekrem’in bir şiarı olan aleyhissalâtü vesselâm kelâmı gibi “radıyallahu anh” terkibi, sahabeye mahsus bir şiar değil belki sahabe gibi veraset-i nübüvvet denilen velayet-i kübrada bulunan ve makam-ı rızaya yetişen Eimme-i Erbaa, Şah-ı Geylanî, İmam-ı Gazalî, İmam-ı Rabbanî gibi zatlara denilmeli. Fakat örf-ü ulemada sahabeye “radıyallahu anh”, tabiîn ve tebe-i tabiîne “rahimehullah”, onlardan sonrakilere “gaferehullah” ve evliyaya “kuddise sırruhu” denilir.
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<span id="Üçüncü_Sualiniz:"></span>
== Üçüncü Sualiniz: ==
==YOUR THIRD QUESTION==
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Which were superior, the great imams and interpreters of the Holy Law, or the shahs and spiritual poles of the true Sufi paths?
Başta müçtehidîn-i izam imamları mı efdal, yoksa hak tarîkatların şahları, aktabları mı efdaldir?
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
'''The Answer:'''Not all the interpreters of the Law were superior to the shahs and spiritual poles, only Abu Hanifa, Malik, Shafi‘i, and Ahmad b. Hanbal. But in some  respects, some  wondrous  spiritual  poles  like  Shaikh  Gilani  reached  more brilliant  stations  in  particular  virtues. However,  general  virtue  was  the  Imams’. Furthermore, some of the shahs of the Sufi paths were also interpreters of the Law; it cannot therefore be said that all interpreters of the Law were superior to the spiritual poles. But it may be said that after the Companions and the Mahdi, the four Imams were superior.
'''Elcevap:''' Umum müçtehidîn değil; belki Ebu Hanife, Mâlik, Şafiî, Ahmed İbn-i Hanbel; şahların, aktabların fevkindedirler. Fakat hususi faziletlerde Şah-ı Geylanî gibi bazı hârika kutublar, bir cihette daha parlak makama sahiptirler. Fakat küllî fazilet imamlarındır. Hem tarîkat şahlarının bir kısmı, müçtehidlerdendir; onun için umum müçtehidîn, aktabdan daha efdaldir, denilmez. Fakat Eimme-i Erbaa, sahabeden ve Mehdi’den sonra en efdallerdir, denilir.
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
"https://risale.site/index.php/Özel:MobileDiff/173225" sayfasından alınmıştır