İçeriğe atla

Hutbe-i Şamiye/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

Hutbe-i Şamiye/en (kaynağı gör)

20.14, 2 Kasım 2024 tarihindeki hâli

86 bayt kaldırıldı ,  2 Kasım
"I shall explain, by means of six ‘Words,’ the lesson I have learnt from the pharmacy of the Qur’an, which is like a faculty of medicine. This lesson constitutes the medicine to cure our social life of those six dire sicknesses." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu
GörselVikimetin
("'''First Word''' The first word is ‘hope;’ that is, to nurture a strong hope of God’s mercy. As a consequence of the lesson I have learnt on my own account, I say: O congregation of Muslims! I give you this good news: the first signs of the true dawn of Arab happiness are just appearing. This happiness will occur through the kindling of the worldly happiness of all Muslims, in particular that of the Ottomans, and especially through the progress of..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
("I shall explain, by means of six ‘Words,’ the lesson I have learnt from the pharmacy of the Qur’an, which is like a faculty of medicine. This lesson constitutes the medicine to cure our social life of those six dire sicknesses." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
109. satır: 109. satır:
“History shows that the Muslims increased in civilization and progressed in relation to the power of the truths of Islam; that is, to the degree that they acted in accordance with that power. History also shows that they fell into savagery and decline, and disaster and defeat amidst utter confusion to the degree of their weakness in adhering to the truths of Islam.” As for other religions, it is quite to the contrary. That is to say, history shows that they increased in civilization and progressed in relation to their weakness in adhering to their religions and bigotry, and were subject to decline and revolution to the degree of their strength in adhering to them. Up to the present, time has passed thus.
“History shows that the Muslims increased in civilization and progressed in relation to the power of the truths of Islam; that is, to the degree that they acted in accordance with that power. History also shows that they fell into savagery and decline, and disaster and defeat amidst utter confusion to the degree of their weakness in adhering to the truths of Islam.” As for other religions, it is quite to the contrary. That is to say, history shows that they increased in civilization and progressed in relation to their weakness in adhering to their religions and bigotry, and were subject to decline and revolution to the degree of their strength in adhering to them. Up to the present, time has passed thus.


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Furthermore, from the blessed time of the Prophet (PBUH) up to the present, not a single event in history has shown us a Muslim who has embraced another religion, whether old or new, in preference to Islam, as result of reasoned argument and conclusive evidence. If the uneducated embrace another religion without evidence in blind imitation, it has no bearing on this matter. And to be without religion is yet another question. However, history shows us that followers of other religions, and even the English and pre-Revolution Russians, who displayed the greatest bigotry in religion, are gradually approaching and entering Islam on the strength of reasoned argument and cogent proofs, sometimes in groups.(*<ref>*Proofs of this claim, and powerful witnesses to it, are the following facts; that, forty-five years after this claim was made, in spite of two appalling world wars and the emergence of an extreme and absolute despotism, small northern states like Sweden, Norway and Finland have accepted and started to teach the Qur'an in their schools as a barrier to communism and irreligion. A number of prominent English orators are also seen to be in favour of encouraging the English to accept the Qur'an. And America, now the most powerful state on earth, is seen to support the truths of religion with all its strength, and has decided that Asia and Africa shall find prosperity, peace and reconcilation through Islam, and it patronizes and encourages the newly emergent Muslim states and tries to enter into alliance with them.</ref>)
Hem asr-ı saadetten şimdiye kadar hiçbir tarih bize göstermiyor ki bir Müslüman’ın muhakeme-i akliye ile ve delil-i yakînî ile ve İslâmiyet’e tercih etmekle eski ve yeni ayrı bir dine girdiğini tarih göstermiyor. Avamın delilsiz, taklidî bir surette başka dine girmesinin bu meselede ehemmiyeti yok. Dinsiz olmak da başka meseledir. Halbuki bütün dinlerin etbaları ise –hattâ en ziyade dinine taassup gösteren İngilizlerin ve eski Rusların– muhakeme-i akliye ile İslâmiyet’e dâhil olduklarını ve günden güne, bazı zaman takım takım kat’î bürhan ile İslâmiyet’e girdiklerini tarihler bize bildiriyorlar. '''(Hâşiye'''<ref>'''Hâşiye:''' İşte bu mezkûr davaya bir delil şudur ki: İki dehşetli harb-i umumînin ve şiddetli bir istibdad-ı mutlakın zuhuruyla beraber, bu davaya kırk beş sene sonra şimalin İsveç, Norveç, Finlandiya gibi küçük devletleri Kur’an’ı mekteplerinde ders vermek ve kabul etmek ve komünistliğe, dinsizliğe karşı set olmak için kabul etmeleri ve İngiliz’in mühim hatiplerinin bir kısmı Kur’an’ı İngiliz’e kabul ettirmeye taraftar çıkmaları ve küre-i arzın şimdiki en büyük devleti Amerika’nın bütün kuvvetiyle din hakikatlerine taraftar çıkması ve İslâmiyet’le Asya ve Afrika’nın saadet ve sükûnet ve musalaha bulacağına karar vermesi ve yeni doğan İslâm devletlerini okşaması ve teşvik etmesi ve onlarla ittifaka çalışması, kırk beş sene evvel olan bu müddeayı ispat ediyor, kuvvetli bir şahit olur.</ref>''')'''
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
"https://risale.site/index.php/Özel:MobileDiff/176664" sayfasından alınmıştır