Yirmi Yedinci Söz/en

TREATISE ON INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENTS OF THE LAW (Ijtihad)

[Five or six years ago in an Arabic treatise, I wrote concerning a matter to do with independent judgements on points of the Shari’a. Now, at the request of two of my brothers, this Word was written about that matter in order to put in his place someone who had overstepped the mark in his attacks on it.]

In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate.

If they had only referred it to the Prophet, or to those charged with authority among them, the proper investigators would have tested it from them [direct].(*)

The door of independent judgements on the law is open, but at the present time there are six ‘Obstacles’ to entering it.

THE FIRST:

In winter when the storms are fierce even small holes are blocked up, and it is in no way reasonable to open up new doors. Under the onslaught of a mighty flood, to make openings in the wall in order to repair it leads to being drowned. In just the same way, at this time of denial and the assault of the customs of Europe and the legion of innovations and the destruction of misguidance, to open up new doors in the citadel of Islam in the name of ijtihad, and make openings that will be the means of those bent on destruction scaling the walls and entering it, is a crime against Islam.

THE SECOND:

Independent judgements may not be made about the essential teachings of religion, for they are specified and definite. Moreover, they are like basic food and sustenance. Although at this time all effort and endeavour should be expended on their being upheld and raised to life, they are being abandoned and degraded. So to give them up, despite their being among the theoretical matters of Islam and due to being the pure and sincere interpretations of the first generations of Islam are not inadequate for the needs of all times, and to make new interpretations of the law in arbitrary fashion, is an innovation and betrayal of Islam.

THE THIRD:

Just as varying goods in the market are sought after according to the season; they are in demand one after the other, so in the exhibition of the world and market of human society and civilization, every century different goods are sought after and are in demand; they are displayed in the market, demand attracts them, gazes are turned on them, minds are drawn by them. Like at the present time the goods of politics and securing the life of this world and the demand of philosophy are sought after, for example. And at the time of the first generations of Islam and in the market of that age, deducing from the Word of the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth His wishes and what He wants of us were the most sought-after goods, and obtaining the means to gain through the light of prophethood and the Qur’an eternal happiness in the world of the hereafter, which had been revealed to such a degree it could not be concealed.

At that time, since people’s minds, hearts and spirits were directed with all their strength towards understanding the wishes of the Sustainer of the Heavens and the Earth, the discussions, conversations, events, and circumstances of social life all looked to that. Since they occurred in accordance with those wishes, whoever had high ability, his heart and nature unconsciously received instruction in knowledge of God from everything. He received knowledge from the circumstances, events, and discussions which took place at that time. As though everything became a teacher for such a person, and inculcated in his nature and disposition the preparatory knowledge for independent judgements. That natural instruction illuminated him to such a degree that he was almost capable of interpreting the law without acquiring the knowledge, to be illuminated without fire... Thus, when someone capable who received such natural instruction in this way began to work at interpreting the law, his capacity which had become like a match manifested the mystery of Light upon Light; he became qualified to interpret it (mujtahid) swiftly and in a brief time.

At this time, however, due to the domination of European civilization and the supremacy of natural philosophy and the preponderance of the conditions of worldly life, minds and hearts have become scattered, and endeavour and favour divided. Minds have become strangers to non-material matters.

Thus, it is because of this that if someone now was to memorize the Qur’an at the age of four and have the intelligence of a mujtahid like Sufyan ibn Uyayna, who held discussions with religious scholars at an early age, he would need ten times longer than Sufyan to become qualified to interpret the law. If Sufyan acquired the learning in ten years, this man would need one hundred years. Because the period of Sufyan’s natural study began at the age of reason. His disposition and abilities were slowly prepared and illuminated; they took lessons from everything and became like a match.

But his counterpart at the present time, since his thought is submerged in philosophy, his mind plunged in politics, and his heart is giddy at the life of this world, his disposition and abilities have grown distant from interpretation of the law. For sure, they have become distant from interpretation of the Shari’a to the degree they have been preoccupied with the modern sciences, and have remained backward in regard to it to the extent he has become learned in the physical sciences. Therefore, he may not say: “I am as intelligent as him. Why can’t I on a level with him?” He does not have the right to say this, and he cannot be on a level with him.

THE FOURTH:

Just as within a body is the inclination to expand, for its growth and development. And, since it is from within, the inclination to expand is a being perfected for the body. Whereas if it is an inclination for expansion from outside it, it is to rip the body’s skin; to destroy it; it is not expansion. In the same way, when the inclination to expand and will to interpret the law were present in those within the sphere of Islam through the door of perfect taqwa and the way of conforming to the essential teachings of Islam, like the righteous early generations, that was a perfection and a being perfected. But if such an inclination and desire come from those who give up the essentials, prefer the life of this world to that of the hereafter, and are tainted with materialist philosophy, it is the means of destroying the body of Islam and casting off the chain of the Shari’a from the neck.

THE FIFTH:

Three points of view make interpretation of the law earthly at this time, and prevent it being heavenly. Whereas the Shari’a is heavenly, revealed, and since interpretations of it make known its hidden ordinances, they also are heavenly.

The First:The wisdom of an ordinance is one thing, while the reason for it is something different. Wisdom and benefit are the cause of its choice, not the means of its being necessitated and created. And the reason is the means for its existence. For example, the obligatory prayers are shortened while travelling; two rak’ats are performed. The reason for this permission of the Shari’a is the journey, while its wisdom is the hardship. If there is the journey but no hardship, the prayers are still shortened. For there is the reason. But if there is no journey yet hardship, it may not be the reason for shortening the prayers. Thus, contrary to this fact, the view at this time is to set up the benefit and wisdom in place of the reason, and to make its judgement in accordance with that. Such an interpretation is certainly earthly, not heavenly.

The Second: The view at the present time looks primarily to worldly happiness, whereas the view of the Shari’a looks primarily to happiness in the hereafter, and to happiness in this world in second place and indirectly as the means to the hereafter. That is to say, the view of this time is a stranger to the spirit of the Shari’a; in which case, it may not make interpretations in its name.

The Third There is a rule: “Necessity makes permissible what is forbidden.” This rule is not universal. So long as it is not by way of what is forbidden, necessity makes licit what is forbidden. But if something has become a necessity due to abuse and for illicit reasons, this necessity may not be the basis of ordinances permitting it, nor form an excuse.

For example, if, through ill choice someone makes himself drunk in an unlawful way, according to scholars of the Shari’a, his actions act against him and he may not be counted as excused. If he divorces his wife, the divorce is in force. And if he commits a crime, he receives the punishment. But if it is not through ill choice, the divorce is not in force, neither does he receive punishment. And, for example, even if an alcoholic is addicted to alcohol to the degree of necessity, he may not say: “It is a necessity, and lawful for me.”

Thus, at this time there are many matters which have reached the degree of necessity and have taken on the form of a general calamity afflicting people, and which, since they have arisen from ill choice, illicit desires, and forbidden acts, may not be the basis of ordinances permitting them and making what is unlawful lawful. However, since those who make interpretations at the present time make those necessities the basis of ordinances of the Shari’a, their interpretations are earthly, the products of their own fancies, tainted by philosophy, and cannot be heavenly or revealed, or in accordance with the Shari’a. However, if exercise of authority concerning the Divine ordinances of the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth and interference in the worship of His servants is without the Creator’s permission, that exercise of authority and interference are rejected.

For example, a number of the heedless and neglectful approve the changing of some of the marks of Islam like the Friday Sermon, and substituting the language of each country for Arabic, for two reasons:

The First: “So that in that way the mass of Muslims will understand current politics.”

But current politics has become so intermixed with lies and trickery and evil that it has become like the very whisperings of Satan. However, the pulpit is the seat of delivering Divine revelation, so political rumours do not have the right to rise to that high position.

The Second: “The Friday Sermon is for understanding the admonitions of certain Suras of the Qur’an.”

Yes, if the majority of the Islamic nation conformed to the essential teachings and incontestable matters of Islam and the ordinances which are well-known and carried them out, then the reading of the Sermon in the known language and the translation of the Qur’an,(*) if it was possible, might have been desirable, in order to understand the theoretical matters of the Shari’a and its subtle matters and abstruse teachings.

But the well-known, incontrovertible ordinances of Islam like the five daily prayers, fasting in Ramadan, and zakat, and the unlawfulness of murder, fornication, and wine are neglected. The ordinary people are not in need of learning their necessity or unlawfulness, but through encouragement and warning, to be reminded of those sacred decrees, and, through their sense of belief and feelings for Islam being stirred, to be prompted, encouraged, and reminded to conform to them.

However lowly and ignorant they may be, they understand the following brief meaning from the Qur’an and Arabic Sermon: “The preacher and the reciter of the Qur’an are recalling the pillars of belief and Islam, which are known by me and everyone, and teaching us, and reciting them.” A longing for them is born in their hearts. What words are there in the universe which can be compared with the miraculous, instructive reminders, warnings, and encouragement of the All-Wise Qur’an, which comes from the Sublime Throne?

THE SIXTH:

Since the great interpreters of the law among the righteous early generations of Islam lived close to the time of the Companions of the Prophet, the age of light and age of truth, they were able to receive a pure light and make pure interpretations. But the interpreters of the law at this time look at the book of reality from behind so many veils and from such a long distance that they can see even its clearest letters only with difficulty.

If you say: The Companions also were human beings and not free of error and differences, while the means of interpretation of the law and the ordinances of the Shari’a is the justice and truthfulness of the Companions, on which the Islamic community have agreed, saying: “All the Companions were just and all spoke the truth.”

The Answer: Yes, the absolute majority of the Companions of the Prophet were lovers of the truth, truthfulness, and justice. For in that age, the ugliness of lies and falsehood was shown in all its ugliness and the beauty of right and truthfulness was shown in all its beauty in such a way that the distance between them stretched from the ground to the Divine Throne. There was a clear separation between them, from the depths of Musaylima the Liar at the lowest of the low to the degree of truthfulness of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace and blessings be upon him) at the highest of the high.

Indeed, just as it was lying that brought Musaylima to the lowest of the low, so it was truthfulness and right which raised Muhammad the Trustworthy to the highest of the high.

Thus, the Companions, who held elevated sentiments and worshipped good morals and were illuminated with the light of the conversation of the Sun of Prophethood, did not stretch out their hands to the buffoonery and filth of the lying in Musaylima’s shop, which was so ugly and the cause of descent, and they shrank from unbelief. So too they shrank from lying, the companion of unbelief, and sought as far as they were able – especially in relating the ordinances of the Shari’a and propagating them– truth, truthfulness, and right, which are so fine and the cause of pride and glory, ascent and progress, and were the thing most in demand from the elevated treasury of the Glory of Messengership, and which illuminate man’s social life with their beauteous splendour; the Companions acted in conformity with them and were desirous of them; this is certain, definite, and necessary.

Whereas at this time, the distance between truth and lying has become so narrow that they are now quite simply shoulder to shoulder. It is extremely easy to pass from truthfulness to lying. Lying is even preferred to truthfulness due to the propaganda of politics and diplomacy. And so, if the most ugly and the finest things are sold in the same shop for the same price, certainly the jewel of truthfulness and right, which is most elevated and penetrates to the essence of reality, will not be obtained blindly, relying on the word and skill of the shopkeeper.

Conclusion

Sacred laws change according to the ages. Indeed, in one age different prophets may come, and they have come. Since subsequent to the Seal of the Prophets, his Greater Shari’a is sufficient for all peoples in every age, no need has remained for different laws. However, in secondary matters, the need for different schools has persisted to a degree.

Just as clothes change with the change of the seasons and medicines change according to dispositions, so sacred laws change according to the ages, and their ordinances change according to the capacities of peoples. Because the secondary matters of the ordinances of the Shari’a look to human circumstances; they come according to them, and are like medicine.

At the time of the early prophets, since social classes were far apart and men’s characters were both somewhat coarse and violent, and their minds, primitive and close to nomadism, the laws at that time came all in different forms, appropriate to their conditions. There were even different prophets and laws in the same continent in the same century.

Then, since with the coming of the Prophet of the end of time, man as though advanced from the primary to the secondary stage, and through numerous revolutions and upheavals reached a position at which all the human peoples could receive a single lesson and listen to a single teacher and act in accordance with a single law, no need remained for different laws, neither was there necessity for different teachers.

But because they were not all at completely the same level and did not proceed in the same sort of social life, the schools of law became numerous.

If, like students of a school of higher education, the vast majority of mankind were clothed in the same sort of social life and attained the same level, then all the schools could be united. But just as the state of the world does not permit that, so the schools of law cannot be the same.

If you say: The truth is one; how can the different ordinances of the four and twelve schools be true?

The Answer: The same water governs in five different ways in five ill people of different disposition, thus: for one, the water is a cure for his illness, and according to medicine, necessary. For another, it is like poison for his sickness and harmful, and medically prohibited. For another, it causes a small amount of harm, and is reprehensible medically. For another the water is beneficial and without harm; according to medicine that is sunna for him. And for yet another it is neither harmful nor beneficial; he can drink it with good health, and for him it is medically permissible. Thus, here the truth has become numerous; all five are true. Are you able to say: “The water is only a cure, only necessary, and it governs in no other way?”

Similarly, impelled by Divine wisdom, the Divine ordinances change according to the schools of law and those who follow them, and they change as truth, and all are true and right.

For example, since, in accordance with Divine wisdom and determining, the majority of those who follow Imam Shafi’i are closer to village life and nomadism than the Hanafis, and are lacking in social life, which makes the community like a single body, each person recites the Fatiha behind the prayer-leader so as to himself express his pains at the Court of the Dispenser of Needs and utter his private wishes. And this is absolutely right and pure wisdom.

However, since most Islamic governments favoured the school of Imam-i A’zam, the great majority of those who follow that school are closer to civilization and town life and more fitted for social life. Thus, the community becomes like a single individual and one man speaks in the name of all; all affirm him with their hearts and bind their hearts to his and his word becomes the word of all; according to the Hanafi school, the Fatiha is not recited behind the prayer-leader. And its not being recited is absolutely right and pure wisdom.

And, for example, since through forming a barrier against the assaults of nature, the Shari’a modifies it and trains the evil-commanding soul, according to the Shafi’i school, most of whose followers are villagers, semi-nomadic, and occupied in manual labour: “Ablutions are spoilt by touching a woman; the slightest uncleanliness is harmful.” While according to the Hanafi School, since the great majority of it followers have entered social life and become ‘semi-civilized:’ “Touching women does not spoil the ablutions; there is licence for a small amount of uncleanliness.”

Now we shall consider a manual worker and a gentleman. Due to his craft and the manner of his livelihood, a worker is afflicted with mixing with and being in contact with women who are canonically strangers to him. Since he sits at the same hearth as them and is involved with unclean things, nature and his evil-commanding soul find the field empty and may attack him. Therefore, in order to form a barrier against such attacks, the Shari’a states concerning them: “Your ablutions will be spoilt; do not touch the women. Your prayers will be invalid; do not be tainted.” A heavenly voice rings in his spiritual ears. Whereas, in accordance with social custom and in the name of common morality, the gentleman –on condition he is honourable– is not afflicted with being in contact with women who are canonically strangers to him, and in the name of cleanliness of civilization, he is not tainted to any degree with unclean things. Therefore, in the Hanafi school, the Shari’a has not shown him harshness and censure; it has shown its permissive side, and lightened it. “If your hand has been touched, your ablutions are not spoilt. If you are ashamed and do not perform the istinja in public, there is no harm in it. A small amount of uncleanliness is permitted.” It saves him from scruples.

Thus, two drops from the ocean as examples for you. Make analogies with them, and if you can, balance them on the scales of the Shari’a in this way, with the balance of Sha’rani’s Mizan.(*)

Glory be unto You, we have no knowledge save that which You have taught us; indeed You are All-Knowing, All-Wise.(*)

O God! Grant blessings and peace to the one in whom were embodied the lights of Your love through the beauty of Your attributes; the comprehensive mirror to the manifestations of Your Most Beautiful Names; in whom was focussed the rays of Your love for the art which is in Your creatures;

the most perfect and wonderful of Your artefacts, who was a sample of the perfections of Your art and an index of the beauties of Your inscriptions; and who reflected the subtleties of Your love and Your desire that Your art be appreciated; the most elevated herald of Your fine art, who proclaimed in resounding voice admiration for the beauty of Your inscriptions, the most wonderful praiser of the perfections of Your art; who reflected together in his being the varieties of Your love and Your appreciation for the good morals of your creatures and the subtleties of Your artefacts’ qualities, comprehending all fine conduct and good morality through Your favour and the subtleties of commendable attributes through Your grace; who was the most excellent criterion and measure of everything You mention in Your Criterion of Truth and Falsehood, the Qur’an, those whom You love from among the righteous, the patient, the believers, those who fear You, who turn to You, and who repent, and all the classes of those whom You infuse with life and honour through Your love in Your Criterion of Truth and Falsehood, until they become as the leader of those whom You love; the master of those beloved by You and chief of Your beloveds; and grant blessings and peace to all his Family and Companions and brothers. Amen. Through Your mercy, O Most Merciful of the Merciful!

Addendum to the Twenty-Seventh Word

On the Companions of the Prophet (PBUH)

Like Mawlana Jami, I say,

O Messenger of God! If only like the dog of the Companions of the Cave,

I could be in Paradise among your Companions.

Is it right that their dog is in Paradise while I am in Hell?

He was the dog of those Companions; I am the dog of yours!

In His Name, be He glorified! And there is nothing but it glorifies Him with praise.

In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate.

Muhammad is the Messenger of God, and those who are with him are strong against the unbelievers, [but] compassionate amongst each other.(*)

You Ask: There are some narrations which say: “At a time when innovations are rife, some of the righteous from among the believers and those who fear God will be on a level with the Companions, or of even greater virtue.” Are these narrations sound? And if so, what is their true meaning?

The Answer:The consensus of the Sunnis, the Ahl al-Sunna wa’l-Jama’at, that after the prophets the most virtuous of mankind are the Companions, is a certain proof that those that are sound out of those narrations refer to minor virtues. For in minor virtues and particular perfections a quality may be deemed preferable to that which is superior and in fact preferable. But from the point of view of general virtue the Companions cannot be reached, who are the subject of Divine praise at the end of Sura al-Fath, and are praised and applauded in the Torah, Gospels, and Qur’an.

For now, we shall explain three points of wisdom concerning this truth, which comprise three reasons, out of very many reasons and instances of wisdom.

First Instance of Wisdom:

The conversation of the Prophet was such an elixir that someone who experienced it for one minute received lights of reality equivalent to years of spiritual journeying. For in conversation there is reflection and a being coloured. It is well-known that through reflection and following and imitating, and through the sublime light of prophethood, a truly exalted level may be reached; –like through allegiance to his sovereign and following him, a sultan’s servant may rise to a position so high a king cannot rise to it. It is due to this mystery that the greatest saints cannot reach the level of the Companions.

Even saints like Jalaluddin Suyuti, who conversed many times with God’s Noble Messenger (PBUH) while awake, even if they do this and are honoured in this world with his company, they still cannot reach the Companions. For through the light of Muhammad’s (PBUH) prophethood, the Companions’ conversation was with him as Prophet. While the saints saw him (PBUH) after his death and conversed with him (PBUH) through the light of his sainthood. That is to say, the personification and appearance of God’s Noble Messenger (PBUH) is in respect of his sainthood, not in regard to his prophethood. Since that is so, however much higher the level of prophethood is to that of sainthood, one should differentiate between the two conversations to that degree.

Just how luminous an elixir was the Prophet’s company may be understood through the following: a primitive man so hard-hearted and savage he buried his daughter alive would come and be honoured with the conversation of the Prophet for an hour, and would acquire such kindness and compassion that he would not step on an ant. And an ignorant savage would converse with the Prophet for a day, then go to lands like China and India and instruct civilized peoples in the realities and guide them in perfections.

Second Reason:

As is explained and proved in the discussion of interpretation of the law in the Twenty-Seventh Word, the vast majority of the Companions were at the highest level of human perfections. For at that time in the mighty revolution of Islam, good and truth appeared in all their beauty, and evil and falsehood, in all their ugliness, and they were felt physically. Such a difference was apparent between good and evil and such a distance opened up between truth and falsehood that they drew as distant from one another as belief is from unbelief, and even Hell is from Paradise.

The Companions, who by nature possessed elevated emotions, were captivated by the highest morality, and inclined towards dignity and virtue, would not voluntarily stretch out their hands to evil and falsehood, and so fall to the level of Musaylima the Liar and his ridiculous utterances. For he was the herald of falsehood, evil, and lies, and their embodiment.

Their characters demanded that they looked to the rank of the perfections, those of God’s Beloved (PBUH) at the highest of the high, who was the herald and embodiment of truthfulness, good, and right, and that they hastened in that way with all their strength and endeavour.

For example, it sometimes happens that in the market of human civilization and shop of social life, everyone flees in disgust from the fearsome results and ugly consequences of certain things, like from a deadly poison, let alone buying them, while the beautiful results and valuable consequences of certain other things and of immaterial goods attract the general view and demand to themselves like a universal panacea and a sparkling brilliant; everyone tries their utmost to buy them.

In just the same way, in the Era of Bliss in the market of human social life, since goods like lying, evil, and unbelief gave rise to results like everlasting misery and base buffoons like Musaylima the Liar, it is certain and clear that the Companions, who were captivated by elevated characteristics and love of exalted things, would flee from them with loathing as from fatal poison. And of a necessity, the Companions, with their pure natures and praiseworthy characteristics, would, with all their strength, emotions, and faculties, be desirous of and customers for truth, truthfulness and belief, which yielded results like eternal happiness and luminous fruits like God’s Noble Messenger (PBUH), as though for the most effective panacea and precious diamond.

However, after that time, the distance between truthfulness and lying has gradually and by degrees diminished, until they have become shoulder to shoulder. Having begun to be sold together in the same shop, social morality has become corrupted. The propaganda of politics has caused greater demand for lying. At a time when the awesome ugliness of lying has begun to be concealed and the shining beauty of truthfulness has begun not to be apparent, who can attain to the strength, constancy, and taqwa of the Companions in the matters of justice, truthfulness, exaltedness, and right, or surpass their level?

I shall explain something which occurred to me which will illuminate this to a degree. It was like this:

One time, it occurred to me, why could wondrous individuals like Muhyiddin al- ’Arabi not attain to the levels of the Companions? Then, while saying, “Glory be to my Sustainer, the Most High” during the prayers, the meaning of the phrase was unfolded to me. Not in its complete meaning, but its reality in part became apparent to me. I said in my heart: “If only I could perform one of the five daily prayers in the same way as this phrase, it would be better than a year’s worship.” After the prayers I understood that that thought and state was guidance indicating that the Companions’ degree in worship could not be reached.

In that mighty social revolution brought about by the lights of the Qur’an, while opposites were separated from one another, and evils together with all their darkness, details and all who followed them, and good and perfections together with all their lights and results came face to face – at such an exciting time, all glorifications of God and recitations of His Names expressed all the levels of their meanings freshly and newly and in a young and unfaded fashion. So too, under the crashing of that mighty revolution all the senses and subtle inner faculties of people were awakened, even senses like those of fancy and imagination, in an awakened and aware state, received the numerous meanings of those recitations and glorifications in accordance with their own perceptions, and absorbed them. Thus, due to this wisdom, when the Companions, whose senses were awakened and subtle faculties, alert, uttered those blessed words comprising the lights of belief and glorification, they did so in all their meaning and they partook of them with all their senses.

However, after that revolution and upheaval, the subtle faculties have gradually sunk into sleep and the senses fallen from that point of realities into heedlessness; like fruits, under the veil of familiarity, those blessed words have gradually lost their delicacy and freshness. Simply, as though drying up through the air of superficiality, only a little freshness remains, and this may be restored to its former state only through drastic surgery of a reflective and reasoning kind. Thus, it is because of this that another can reach the virtue and level the Companions attained to in forty minutes, only in forty years.

Third Reason:

As is proved in the Twelfth, Twenty-Fourth, and Twenty-Fifth Words, the comparison of prophethood and sainthood is that of the sun itself and the sun’s image as it appears in mirrors. Thus, however much higher the sphere of prophethood is than that of sainthood, the servants of the sphere of prophethood and the Companions, the stars of that Sun, have to be superior to the righteous in the sphere of sainthood to the same degree. The legacy of prophethood and veracity, which is the supreme sainthood, is the sainthood of the Companions; even if a saint attains to this, he still cannot reach the level of the Companions, the first rank. We shall explain three out of the numerous aspects of this Third Reason.

First Aspect: The Companions cannot be reached in interpretation of the law, that is, in deducing its ordinances, that is, in understanding what pleases Almighty God from His Word.

Because that mighty Divine revolution revolved on understanding the dominical wishes and Divine ordinances. All minds were turned towards deducing the Divine ordinances. All hearts were eager to know “What does our Sustainer want from us?” All that happened at that time did so in a way that made this known and understood. The discussions of the time concerned them. Thus, since everything and all situations and discussions and conversations and stories occurred in such a way as to give some sort of instruction in these meanings, and since this perfected the Companions’ capacities and illuminated their minds, and since their ability to interpret the law and deduce its ordinances was ready to be lit up like a match, someone at this time with the intelligence and capacity of the Companions could not reach in ten years or perhaps in a hundred, the level of deduction and interpretation they reached in a day or a month.

Because now, worldly happiness is the focus of attention in place of eternal happiness. Mankind’s attention and view is directed towards different goals. Since the struggle for livelihood together with lack of reliance on God has bewildered man’s spirit, and Naturalist and Materialist philosophies have blinded his intellect, just as the social environment does not strengthen a person’s mind and capacity in the matter of interpreting the Divine law, so it confuses and scatters them. We proved in the discussion on interpretation of the law in the Twenty-Seventh Word in the comparison between Sufyan ibn Uyayna and someone of his intelligence today that the other person could not acquire in a hundred years what Sufyan acquired in ten.

İkinci Vecih: Sahabelerin kurbiyet-i İlahiye noktasındaki makamlarına velayet ayağıyla yetişilmez.

Çünkü Cenab-ı Hak bize akrebdir ve her şeyden daha ziyade yakındır. Biz ise ondan nihayetsiz uzağız. Onun kurbiyetini kazanmak iki suretle olur.

Birisi: Akrebiyetin inkişafıyladır ki nübüvvetteki kurbiyet ona bakar ve nübüvvet veraseti ve sohbeti cihetiyle sahabeler o sırra mazhardırlar.

İkinci suret: Bu’diyetimiz noktasında kat’-ı meratib edip bir derece kurbiyete müşerref olmaktır ki ekser seyr ü sülûk-u velayet ona göre ve seyr-i enfüsî ve seyr-i âfakî bu suretle cereyan ediyor.

İşte birinci suret sırf vehbîdir, kesbî değil; incizabdır, cezb-i Rahmanîdir ve mahbubiyettir. Yol kısadır fakat çok metin ve çok yüksektir ve çok hâlistir ve gölgesizdir. Diğeri; kesbîdir, uzundur, gölgelidir. Acayip hârikaları çok ise de kıymetçe, kurbiyetçe evvelkisine yetişemez.

Mesela, nasıl ki dünkü güne, bugün yetişmek için iki yol var:

Birincisi: Zamanın cereyanına tabi olmayarak, bir kuvvet-i kudsiye ile fevka’z-zaman çıkıp dünü, bugün gibi hazır görmektir.

İkincisi: Bir sene kat’-ı mesafe edip, dönüp dolaşıp düne gelmektir. Fakat yine dünü elde tutamıyor, onu bırakıp gidiyor.

Öyle de zâhirden hakikate geçmek iki suretledir:

Biri: Doğrudan doğruya hakikatin incizabına kapılıp, tarîkat berzahına girmeden hakikati ayn-ı zâhir içinde bulmaktır.

İkincisi: Çok meratibden seyr ü sülûk suretiyle geçmektir. Ehl-i velayet, çendan fena-i nefse muvaffak olurlar, nefs-i emmareyi öldürürler. Yine sahabeye yetişemiyorlar. Çünkü sahabelerin nefisleri tezkiye ve tathir edildiğinden; nefsin mahiyetindeki cihazat-ı kesîre ile ubudiyetin envaına ve şükür ve hamdin aksamına daha ziyade mazhardırlar. Fena-i nefisten sonra, ubudiyet-i evliya besatet peyda eder.

Üçüncü Vecih: Fazilet-i a’mal ve sevab-ı ef’al ve fazilet-i uhreviye cihetinde sahabelere yetişilmez.

Çünkü nasıl bir asker bazı şerait dâhilinde, mühim ve mahuf bir mevkide, bir saat nöbette, bir sene ibadet kadar bir fazilet kazanabilir ve bir dakikada bir kurşunu yemekle, en ekall kırk günde ancak kazanılacak velayet derecesi gibi bir makama çıkıyor.

Öyle de sahabelerin tesis-i İslâmiyet’te ve neşr-i ahkâm-ı Kur’aniyede hizmetleri ve İslâmiyet için bütün dünyaya ilan-ı harp etmeleri, o kadar yüksektir ki bir dakikasına başkaları bir senede yetişemez. Hattâ denilebilir ki bütün dakikaları –o hizmet-i kudsiyede– o şehit olan neferin dakikası gibidir. Bütün saatleri, müthiş bir makamda bir saat nöbet tutan fedakâr bir neferin nöbeti gibidir ki amel az, ücreti çok, kıymeti yüksektir.

Evet, sahabeler madem İslâmiyet’in tesisinde ve envar-ı Kur’aniyenin neşrinde, saff-ı evvel teşkil ediyorlar.    اَلسَّبَبُ كَال۟فَاعِلِ   sırrınca bütün ümmetin hasenatından onlara hisse çıkar. Ümmetin اَللّٰهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلٰى سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلٰى اٰلِهٖ وَاَص۟حَابِهٖ demesiyle sahabelerin, bütün ümmetin hasenatından hissedarlıklarını gösteriyor. Hem nasıl ki bir ağacın kökündeki küçük bir meziyet; ağacın dallarında büyük bir suret alır, büyük bir daldan daha büyüktür. Hem nasıl ki mebdede küçük bir irtifa, gittikçe bir yekûn teşkil eder. Hem nasıl ki nokta-i merkeziyeye yakın bir iğne ucu kadar bir ziyadelik; daire-i muhitada, bazen bir metre kadar ziyadeye mukabil geliyor.

Aynen şu dört misal gibi sahabeler, İslâmiyet’in şecere-i nuraniyesinin köklerinden, esaslarından oldukları hem bina-yı İslâmiyet’in hutut-u nuraniyesinin mebdeinde hem cemaat-i İslâmiyenin imamlarından ve adetlerinin evvellerinde hem Şems-i Nübüvvet ve Sirac-ı Hakikat’in merkezine yakın olduklarından; az amelleri çoktur, küçük hizmetleri büyüktür. Onlara yetişmek için hakiki sahabe olmak lâzım geliyor.

اَللّٰهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلٰى سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ _نِ الَّذٖى قَالَ :

اَص۟حَابٖى كَالنُّجُومِ بِاَيِّهِم۟ اِق۟تَدَي۟تُم۟ اِه۟تَدَي۟تُم۟ وَ خَي۟رُ ال۟قُرُونِ قَر۟نٖى وَ عَلٰى اٰلِهٖ وَ صَح۟بِهٖ وَ سَلِّم۟

سُب۟حَانَكَ لَا عِل۟مَ لَنَٓا اِلَّا مَا عَلَّم۟تَنَٓا اِنَّكَ اَن۟تَ ال۟عَلٖيمُ ال۟حَكٖيمُ

Sual: Deniliyor ki: Sahabeler Resul-i Ekrem aleyhissalâtü vesselâmı gördüler, sonra iman ettiler. Biz ise görmeden iman ettik. Öyle ise imanımız daha kavîdir. Hem kuvvet-i imanımıza delâlet eden rivayet var?

Elcevap: Sahabeler o zamanda, efkâr-ı âmme-i âlem hakaik-i İslâmiyeye muarız ve muhalif iken –sahabeler– yalnız suret-i insaniyede Resul-i Ekrem aleyhissalâtü vesselâmı görüp, bazen mu’cizesiz olarak öyle bir iman getirmişler ki bütün efkâr-ı âmme-i âlem, onların imanlarını sarsmıyordu. Şüphe değil, bazısına vesvese de vermezdi.

Sizler iseniz kendi imanınızı, sahabelerin imanlarıyla muvazene ediyorsunuz. Bütün efkâr-ı âmme-i İslâmiye, imanınıza kuvvet ve senet olduğu halde; Resul-i Ekrem aleyhissalâtü vesselâmın şecere-i tûba-i nübüvvetinin çekirdeği olan beşeriyeti ve suret-i cismaniyesini değil belki umum envar-ı İslâmiye ve hakaik-i Kur’aniye ile nurani muhteşem şahs-ı manevîsini bin mu’cizat ile muhat olarak akıl gözüyle gördüğünüz halde, bir Avrupa feylesofunun sözüyle vesveseye ve şüpheye düşen imanınız nerede? Bütün âlem-i küfrün ve Nasâra ve Yehud’un ve feylesofların hücumlarına karşı sarsılmayan sahabelerin imanları nerede? Hem sahabelerin kuvvet-i imanlarını gösteren ve imanlarının tereşşuhatı olan şiddet-i takvaları ve kemal-i salahatleri nerede? Ey müddeî! Senin şiddet-i zaafından, feraizi tamamıyla senden göstermeyen sönük imanın nerede?

Amma hadîste vârid olan ki “Âhir zamanda beni görmeyen ve iman getiren, daha ziyade makbuldür.” mealindeki rivayet, hususi fazilete dairdir. Has bazı eşhas hakkındadır. Bahsimiz ise fazilet-i külliye ve ekseriyet itibarıyladır.

İkinci Sual: Diyorlar ki: Ehl-i velayet ve ashab-ı kemalât, dünyayı terk etmişler. Hattâ hadîste var ki: “Dünya muhabbeti bütün hataların başıdır.” Halbuki sahabeler dünyaya pek çok girmişler; terk-i dünya değil belki bir kısım sahabe, o zamanın ehl-i medeniyetinden daha ileri gitmişler. Nasıl oluyor ki böyle sahabelerin en ednasına, en büyük bir veli kadar kıymeti var, diyorsunuz?

Elcevap: Otuz İkinci Söz’ün İkinci ve Üçüncü Mevkıflarında gayet kat’î ispat edilmiştir ki: Dünyanın âhirete bakan yüzüyle, esma-i İlahiyeye mukabil olan yüzünü sevmek; sebeb-i noksaniyet değil belki medar-ı kemaldir ve o iki yüzde ne kadar ileri gitse daha ziyade ibadet ve marifetullahta ileri gider. Sahabelerin dünyası ise işte o iki yüzdedir. Dünyayı âhiret mezraası görüp ekip biçmişler. Mevcudatı, esma-i İlahiyenin âyinesi görüp müştakane temaşa edip bakmışlar. Fena-i dünya ise fâni yüzüdür ki insanın hevesatına bakar.

Üçüncü Sual: Tarîkatlar, hakikatlerin yollarıdır. Tarîkatların içerisinde en meşhur ve en yüksek ve cadde-i kübra iddia olunan tarîk-i Nakşibendî hakkında, o tarîkatın kahramanlarından ve imamlarından bazıları esasını böyle tarif etmişler. Demişler ki:

دَر۟ طَرٖيقِ نَق۟شِبَن۟دٖى لَازِم۟ اٰمَد۟ چَار۟ تَر۟ك۟ :

تَر۟كِ دُن۟يَا تَر۟كِ عُق۟بٰى تَر۟كِ هَس۟تٖى تَر۟كِ تَر۟ك۟

Yani, tarîk-i Nakşî’de dört şeyi bırakmak lâzım. Hem dünyayı hem nefis hesabına âhireti dahi maksud-u hakiki yapmamak hem vücudunu unutmak hem ucbe, fahre girmemek için bu terkleri düşünmemektir. Demek, hakiki marifetullah ve kemalât-ı insaniye terk-i mâsiva ile olur?

Elcevap: Eğer insan yalnız bir kalpten ibaret olsaydı bütün mâsivayı terk, hattâ esma ve sıfâtı dahi bırakmak, yalnız Cenab-ı Hakk’ın zatına rabt-ı kalp etmek lâzım gelirdi. Fakat insanın akıl, ruh, sır, nefis gibi pek çok vazifedar letaifi ve hâsseleri vardır.

İnsan-ı kâmil odur ki: Bütün o letaifi; kendilerine mahsus ayrı ayrı tarîk-i ubudiyette, hakikat canibine sevk etmek ile sahabe gibi geniş bir dairede, zengin bir surette, kalp bir kumandan gibi letaif askerleriyle kahramanane maksada yürüsün. Yoksa kalp, yalnız kendini kurtarmak için askerini bırakıp tek başıyla gitmek, medar-ı iftihar değil belki netice-i ıztırardır.

Dördüncü Sual: Sahabelere karşı iddia-yı rüçhan nereden çıkıyor? Kim çıkarıyor? Şu zamanda, bu meseleyi medar-ı bahis etmek nedendir? Hem müçtehidîn-i izama karşı müsavat dava etmek neden ileri geliyor?

Elcevap: Şu meseleyi söyleyen iki kısımdır:

Bir kısmı, safi ehl-i diyanet ve ehl-i ilimdir ki bazı ehadîsi görmüşler, şu zamanda ehl-i takva ve salahati teşvik ve tergib için öyle mebhaslar açıyorlar. Bu kısma karşı sözümüz yok. Zaten onlar azdırlar, çabuk da intibaha gelirler.

Diğer kısım ise gayet müthiş mağrur insanlardır ki mezhepsizliklerini, müçtehidîn-i izama müsavat davası altında neşretmek istiyorlar ve dinsizliklerini, sahabeye karşı müsavat davası altında icra etmek istiyorlar. Çünkü:

Evvelen: O ehl-i dalalet sefahete girmiş, sefahette tiryaki olmuş; sefahete mani olan tekâlif-i Şer’iyeyi yapamıyor. Kendine bir bahane bulmak için der ki: “Şu mesail, içtihadiyedirler. O mesailde, mezhepler birbirine muhalif gidiyor. Hem onlar da bizim gibi insanlardır, hata edebilirler. Öyle ise biz de onlar gibi içtihad ederiz, istediğimiz gibi ibadetimizi yaparız. Onlara tabi olmaya ne mecburiyetimiz var?” İşte bu bedbahtlar, bu desise-i şeytaniye ile başlarını mezahibin zincirinden çıkarıyorlar. Bunların şu davaları ne kadar çürük, ne kadar esassız olduğu Yirmi Yedinci Söz’de kat’î bir surette gösterildiğinden ona havale ederiz.

Sâniyen: O kısım ehl-i dalalet baktılar ki müçtehidînlerde iş bitmiyor. Onların omuzlarındaki yalnız nazariyat-ı diniyedir. Halbuki bu kısım ehl-i dalalet, zaruriyat-ı diniyeyi terk ve tağyir etmek istiyorlar. “Onlardan daha iyiyiz.” deseler, meseleleri tamam olmuyor. Çünkü müçtehidîn, nazariyata ve kat’î olmayan teferruata karışabilirler.

Halbuki bu mezhepsiz ehl-i dalalet, zaruriyat-ı diniyede dahi fikirlerini karıştırmak ve kabil-i tebdil olmayan mesaili tebdil etmek ve kat’î erkân-ı İslâmiyeye karşı gelmek istediklerinden; elbette zaruriyat-ı diniyenin hameleleri ve direkleri olan sahabelere ilişecekler.

Heyhat! Değil bunlar gibi insan suretindeki hayvanlar, belki hakiki insanlar ve hakiki insanların en kâmilleri olan evliyanın büyükleri; sahabenin küçüklerine karşı müsavat davasını kazanamadıkları, gayet kat’î bir surette Yirmi Yedinci Söz’de ispat edilmiştir.

اَللّٰهُمَّ صَلِّ وَ سَلِّم۟ عَلٰى رَسُولِكَ الَّذٖى قَالَ :

لَاتَسُبُّوا اَص۟حَابٖى لَو۟ اَن۟فَقَ اَحَدُكُم۟ مِث۟لَ اُحُدٍ ذَهَبًا مَا بَلَغَ نِص۟فَ مُدٍّ مِن۟ اَص۟حَابٖى

صَدَقَ رَسُولُ اللّٰهِ

سُب۟حَانَكَ لَا عِل۟مَ لَنَٓا اِلَّا مَا عَلَّم۟تَنَٓا اِنَّكَ اَن۟تَ ال۟عَلٖيمُ ال۟حَكٖيمُ

---

Yirmi Altıncı Söz ⇐ | Sözler | ⇒ Yirmi Sekizinci Söz

---