İçeriğe atla

Yirmi Altıncı Söz/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

"Also, pre-eternity is not the tip of a chain reaching into the past which should be considered the end point in the existence of things and a source of compulsion. Rather, pre-eternity holds the past, the present, and the future all at once, looking at them from above like a mirror. In which case, it is not right to imagine an end to past time which stretches back within the sphere of contingency and call it pre-eternity, and to suppose that things ente..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu
("'''The Fourth:''' Divine Determining is a sort of knowledge. Knowledge is dependent on the thing known. That is, it knows it as it is. The thing known is not dependent on knowledge.That is, the principles of knowledge are not fundamental so that the knowledge directs the thing known with regard to its external existence. Because the essence of the thing known and its external existence look to will and are based on power." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
("Also, pre-eternity is not the tip of a chain reaching into the past which should be considered the end point in the existence of things and a source of compulsion. Rather, pre-eternity holds the past, the present, and the future all at once, looking at them from above like a mirror. In which case, it is not right to imagine an end to past time which stretches back within the sphere of contingency and call it pre-eternity, and to suppose that things ente..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
59. satır: 59. satır:
'''The Fourth:''' Divine Determining is a sort of knowledge. Knowledge is dependent on the thing  known. That is, it knows it as it is. The thing known is not dependent on knowledge.That is, the  principles of  knowledge  are  not  fundamental so  that  the knowledge directs the thing known with  regard to its external existence. Because the essence of the thing known and its external existence  look  to will and are based on power.
'''The Fourth:''' Divine Determining is a sort of knowledge. Knowledge is dependent on the thing  known. That is, it knows it as it is. The thing known is not dependent on knowledge.That is, the  principles of  knowledge  are  not  fundamental so  that  the knowledge directs the thing known with  regard to its external existence. Because the essence of the thing known and its external existence  look  to will and are based on power.


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Also, pre-eternity is not the tip of a chain reaching into the past which should be considered the end point in the existence of things and a source of compulsion. Rather, pre-eternity holds the past, the present, and the future all at once, looking at them from above like a mirror. In which case, it is not right to imagine an end to past time which stretches back within the  sphere of contingency and call it pre-eternity, and to suppose that things enter that knowledge of pre-eternity in sequence, and that oneself is outside it; to reason thus is not right. Consider the  following  example in order to explain this mystery:
Hem ezel, mazi silsilesinin bir ucu değil ki eşyanın vücudunda esas tutulup ona göre bir mecburiyet tasavvur edilsin. Belki ezel; mazi ve hal ve istikbali birden tutar, yüksekten bakar bir âyine-misaldir. Öyle ise daire-i mümkinat içinde uzanıp giden zamanın mazi tarafında bir uç tahayyül edip, ona ezel deyip o ezel ilmine, eşyanın tertip ile girmesini ve kendisini onun haricinde tevehhüm etmesi, ona göre muhakeme etmek hakikat değildir.
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">