İçeriğe atla

On Beşinci Mektup/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

"'''If it is asked:''' If he was so right and just, why wasn’t he successful? Also, why did divine determining and divine mercy permit them to meet with the tragic end they did?" içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu
("'''The Other:''' The principles of racialism and nationalism are not based on justice and right, so are unjust and wrongful. They do not proceed on justice. For a ruler of racialist leanings gives preference to people of the same race and cannot act justly." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
("'''If it is asked:''' If he was so right and just, why wasn’t he successful? Also, why did divine determining and divine mercy permit them to meet with the tragic end they did?" içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
87. satır: 87. satır:
'''The Other:''' The principles of racialism and nationalism are not based on justice and right, so are unjust and wrongful. They do not proceed on justice. For a ruler of racialist  leanings gives preference to people of the same race and cannot act justly.
'''The Other:''' The principles of racialism and nationalism are not based on justice and right, so are unjust and wrongful. They do not proceed on justice. For a ruler of racialist  leanings gives preference to people of the same race and cannot act justly.


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
According to the clear decree of, “Islam abrogated the tribalism of Ignorance. There is no difference between an  Abyssinian slave and a leader of the Quraish, once they have accepted Islam,”(*<ref>*See, Bukhari, Ahkam, 4; ‘Imara, 36, 37; Abu Da’ud, Sunna, 5; Tirmidhi, Jihad, 28; ‘Ilm, 16; Nasa’i, Bay’a, 26; Ibn Maja, Jihad, 39; Musnad, iv, 69, 70, 199, 204, 205; v, 381; vi, 402, 403.</ref>)the bonds of nationalism may not be set up in place of the bonds of religion. If they are, there will be no justice; right will disappear.
اَل۟اِس۟لَامِيَّةُ جَبَّتِ ال۟عَصَبِيَّةَ ال۟جَاهِلِيَّةَ
لَا فَر۟قَ بَي۟نَ عَب۟دٍ حَبَشِىٍّ وَسَيِّدٍ قُرَي۟شِىٍّ اِذَا اَس۟لَمَا
ferman-ı kat’îsiyle: Rabıta-i diniye yerine rabıta-i milliye ikame edilmez; edilse adalet edilmez, hakkaniyet gider.
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Thus, Husain accepted the bonds of religion as fundamental and struggled against those others as someone executing justice, until he attained the rank of martyrdom.
İşte Hazret-i Hüseyin rabıta-i diniyeyi esas tutup muhik olarak onlara karşı mücadele etmiş, tâ makam-ı şehadeti ihraz etmiş.
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
'''If it is asked:''' If he was so right and just, why wasn’t he successful? Also, why did divine determining and divine mercy permit them to meet with the tragic end they did?
'''Eğer denilse:''' Bu kadar haklı ve hakikatli olduğu halde, neden muvaffak olmadı? Hem neden kader-i İlahî ve rahmet-i İlahiye onların feci bir âkıbete uğramasına müsaade etmiş?
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">