On Dördüncü Söz/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

On Dördüncü Söz/en (kaynağı gör)

15.26, 1 Ağustos 2024 tarihindeki hâli

93 bayt eklendi , 1 Ağustos

"'''Second Comparison:''' For example, if, through abandoning his minor duty on a mighty royal ship, a common man causes harm to come to the results of the duties of all the others employed on the ship, and some of them even are made to come to nothing, the ship’s owner will complain bitterly about him in the name of all the others. And the one at fault cannot say: “I’m just an ordinary person. I don’t deserve this severity because of my unimporta..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

GörselVikimetin

Ferhat

Bürokratlar, Arayüz yöneticileri, Push abonelik yöneticileri, Gözetmenler, Hizmetliler, translator

78.189

düzenleme

@@ 40. satır: / 40. satır: @@
 '''First Comparison:''' For example, there was a royal garden in which innumerable fruit-bearing and flowering things were found. Many servants were appointed to attend to it. The duty of one of the servants was only to open the water canal so that the water  could spread throughout the garden and be benefited from. But the servant was lazy and did not open the canal, so harm came to the growth of the garden, or else it dried up. All the other servants had the right to complain, not about the Creator’s dominical art and the Sultan’s royal supervision and the obedient service of the light, air, and earth, but about that foolish servant, for their duties were all made fruitless, or else harm came to them.
-<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
+'''Second Comparison:''' For example, if, through abandoning his minor duty on a mighty royal ship, a common man causes harm to come to the results of the duties of all the others employed on the ship, and some of them even are made to come to nothing, the ship’s owner will complain bitterly about him in the name of all the others. And the one at fault cannot say: “I’m just an ordinary person. I don’t deserve this severity because of my unimportant omission.” For a single instance of non-existence results in innumerable such instances, whereas existence yields results in accordance with itself. For although the existence of a thing is dependent on the existence of all the conditions and causes, its non-existence, its removal, occurs with the removal of a single condition and results from the  non-existence of a single particular. It is because of this that ‘destruction is much easier than repair’ has become like a universally accepted principle.
-'''İkinci Temsil:''' Mesela, cesîm bir sefine-i sultaniyede, âdi bir adam cüz’î vazifesini terk etmesiyle, bütün gemideki vazifedarların netaic-i hidematına halel getirdiğinden ve bazı da mahvettiğinden bütün o vazifedarlar namına gemi sahibi ondan şedit şikâyet eder. Kusur sahibi ise diyemez ki: “Ben bir âdi adamım, ehemmiyetsiz ihmalimden şu şiddete müstahak değilim.” Çünkü tek bir adem, hadsiz ademleri intac eder. Fakat vücud kendine göre semere verir. Çünkü bir şeyin vücudu, bütün şerait ve esbabın vücuduna mütevakkıf olduğu halde; o şeyin ademi, intifası, tek bir şartın intifasıyla ve tek bir cüzün ademiyle netice itibarıyla mün’adim olur. Bundandır ki “Tahrip, tamirden pek çok defa eshel olduğu” bir düstur-u mütearife hükmüne geçmiştir.
-</div>
 <div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">