İçeriğe atla

Yirmi Altıncı Söz/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

"'''The Sixth:'''(*<ref>*This is a truth addressing exact scholars in particular.</ref>) According to Maturidi, inclination, the essence of the power of choice, is a theoretical or relative matter and may be attributed to God’s servants. But Ash’ari considered it to have existence, so did not attribute it to them. However, according to Ash’ari, the power of disposal within inclination is a theoretical matter, which makes the inclination and the d..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu
("'''The Answer:''' Because Divine Determining specified that so-and-so’s death would occur through the man’s rifle. If you suppose that he did not fire the rifle, then you are supposing that Divine Determining had no connection with it, so with what would you decree his death? If you imagine cause and effect to be separate like the Jabriyya, or you deny Divine Determining like the Mu’tazila, you leave the Sunni School and join the heretics. We peop..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
("'''The Sixth:'''(*<ref>*This is a truth addressing exact scholars in particular.</ref>) According to Maturidi, inclination, the essence of the power of choice, is a theoretical or relative matter and may be attributed to God’s servants. But Ash’ari considered it to have existence, so did not attribute it to them. However, according to Ash’ari, the power of disposal within inclination is a theoretical matter, which makes the inclination and the d..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
71. satır: 71. satır:
'''The Answer:''' Because Divine Determining specified that so-and-so’s death would occur through the man’s rifle. If you suppose that he did not fire the rifle, then you are supposing that Divine Determining had no connection with it, so with what would you decree his death? If you imagine cause and effect to be separate like the Jabriyya, or you deny Divine  Determining like the Mu’tazila, you leave the Sunni School and join the heretics. We people of truth say: “If he had not fired the rifle, we do not know if he would have died.” The Jabariyya say: “If he had not fired it, he still would have died.” While the Mu’tazila say: “If he had not fired it, he would not have died.”
'''The Answer:''' Because Divine Determining specified that so-and-so’s death would occur through the man’s rifle. If you suppose that he did not fire the rifle, then you are supposing that Divine Determining had no connection with it, so with what would you decree his death? If you imagine cause and effect to be separate like the Jabriyya, or you deny Divine  Determining like the Mu’tazila, you leave the Sunni School and join the heretics. We people of truth say: “If he had not fired the rifle, we do not know if he would have died.” The Jabariyya say: “If he had not fired it, he still would have died.” While the Mu’tazila say: “If he had not fired it, he would not have died.”


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
'''The Sixth:'''(*<ref>*This is a truth addressing exact scholars in particular.</ref>) According to Maturidi, inclination, the essence of the power of choice, is a theoretical or relative matter and may be attributed to God’s servants. But Ash’ari considered it to have existence, so did not attribute it to them. However, according to Ash’ari, the power of disposal within inclination is a theoretical matter, which makes the inclination  and  the  disposal  together  a  relative  matter  lacking  a  definite  external existence. Theoretical or relative matters do not require causes through which, for their existence, necessity would intervene and nullify the will and power of choice. Rather, if the cause of the theoretical matters  acquires  the weight of preference, the theoretical matter may  become  actual and  existent. In which  case, at  that  juncture, it  may  be abandoned. The Qur’an may say to a person at that point: “This is evil; do not do it.”
'''Altıncısı:''' (Hâşiye-1<ref>'''Hâşiye-1:''' Gayet müdakkik âlimlere mahsus bir hakikattir. </ref>) Cüz-i ihtiyarînin üssü’l-esası olan meyelan, Matüridîce bir emr-i itibarîdir, abde verilebilir. Fakat Eş’arî, ona mevcud nazarıyla baktığı için abde vermemiş. Fakat o meyelandaki tasarruf, Eş’ariyece bir emr-i itibarîdir. Öyle ise o meyelan, o tasarruf, bir emr-i nisbîdir. Muhakkak bir vücud-u haricîsi yoktur. Emr-i itibarî ise illet-i tamme istemez ki illet-i tamme vücudu için lüzum ve zaruret ve vücub ortaya girip ihtiyarı ref’etsin. Belki o emr-i itibarînin illeti, bir rüçhaniyet derecesinde bir vaziyet alsa, o emr-i itibarî sübut bulabilir. Öyle ise o anda onu terk edebilir. Kur’an ona o anda diyebilir ki: “Şu şerdir, yapma.”
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">