İçeriğe atla

On İkinci Şuâ/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

"Also, due to the signature in one treatise of a wonderful and extra-ordinary ‘coincidence,’ the prosecution made a meaningless inference, saying “the members of a political society.” Are the holders of signatures of this sort in the account books of tradesmen and innkeepers called a society. There was a similar baseless accusation in Eskişehir Court. When I replied and showed the treatise called The Miracles of Muhammad (PBUH), they were aston..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu
("With the idea of interfering in the social teachings of the Risale-i Nur, the prosecution said: “The place of religion is the conscience; it cannot be tied to laws and regulations." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
("Also, due to the signature in one treatise of a wonderful and extra-ordinary ‘coincidence,’ the prosecution made a meaningless inference, saying “the members of a political society.” Are the holders of signatures of this sort in the account books of tradesmen and innkeepers called a society. There was a similar baseless accusation in Eskişehir Court. When I replied and showed the treatise called The Miracles of Muhammad (PBUH), they were aston..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
211. satır: 211. satır:
Formerly there was social unrest because it was tied to laws.” So I say: “Religion does not consist only of belief; its second half is righteous action. Is fear of imprisonment or  being seen by a government detective sufficient to deter those who commit  numerous  grievous  sins which poison society,  like murder, adultery,  theft, gambling,  and  drinking?  If  that  was  so,  there  would  have  to  be  a  policeman  or detective stationed permanently in  every house, or at everyone’s side even, so that obdurate souls would restrain themselves from those filthy acts. Whereas, in respect of good deeds and belief, the Risale-i Nur places a  permanent immaterial ‘prohibitor’ next to everyone. It easily saves them from bad deeds by recalling the prison of Hell and Divine wrath.
Formerly there was social unrest because it was tied to laws.” So I say: “Religion does not consist only of belief; its second half is righteous action. Is fear of imprisonment or  being seen by a government detective sufficient to deter those who commit  numerous  grievous  sins which poison society,  like murder, adultery,  theft, gambling,  and  drinking?  If  that  was  so,  there  would  have  to  be  a  policeman  or detective stationed permanently in  every house, or at everyone’s side even, so that obdurate souls would restrain themselves from those filthy acts. Whereas, in respect of good deeds and belief, the Risale-i Nur places a  permanent immaterial ‘prohibitor’ next to everyone. It easily saves them from bad deeds by recalling the prison of Hell and Divine wrath.


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Also, due to the signature in one treatise  of a  wonderful and extra-ordinary ‘coincidence,’ the prosecution made a meaningless inference, saying “the members of a political society.” Are the holders of signatures of this sort in the account books of tradesmen and innkeepers called a society. There was a similar baseless accusation in Eskişehir Court. When I replied and showed the treatise called The Miracles of Muhammad (PBUH), they were astonished. If we had formed a worldly society, those who had suffered so much harm on my account would certainly have fled from me in total abhorrence.
Hem makam-ı iddia bir risalenin güzel ve fevkalâde kerametkârane bir tevafukunun imza edilmesiyle “bir cemiyet efradı” diye manasız bir emare beyan etmiş. Acaba esnafların ve hancıların defterlerinde bulunan bu nevi imzalara cemiyet unvanı verilir mi? Eskişehir’de aynı böyle bir vehim oldu. Cevap verdiğim ve Mu’cizat-ı Ahmediye Risalesi’ni gösterdiğim zaman taaccüble karşıladılar. Eğer mabeynimizde dünyevî bir cemiyet olsaydı, bu derece benim yüzümden zarar görenler, elbette kemal-i nefretle benden kaçacak idiler.
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
This means that just as I and we have a relationship with Imam Ghazali which is not broken off because it pertains to the hereafter  not  to  this  world;  so these  innocent, sincere, pure religious  people have displayed  a powerful attachment  to  an  unfortunate  like myself for the sake of his teachings about belief. This has given rise to  unfounded suspicions of an imaginary political society. My last word is:
Demek nasıl ben ve biz, İmam-ı Gazalî ile irtibatımız var, kopmuyor çünkü uhrevîdir, dünyaya bakmıyor. Aynen öyle de bu masum ve safi ve hâlis dindarlar, benim gibi bir bîçareye iman derslerinin hatırı için bir kuvvetli alâka göstermişler. Ondan bu asılsız, mevhum bir cemiyet-i siyasiye vehmini vermiş. Son sözüm:
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">