İçeriğe atla

On Dokuzuncu Mektup/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

"The Second is implicit revelation. The essence and gist of this is also based on revelation or inspiration, but its explanation and description were left to the Messenger (UWBP). When he explained and described such revelation, sometimes he again relied on revelation, or on inspiration, or sometimes he spoke in terms of his own insight. When he resorted to his own interpretation, he either relied on the perceptive power given him on account of h..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu
("'''The First''' is explicit revelation. In this case, the Noble Messenger (Upon whom be blessings and peace) is merely an interpreter and announcer, with no share in the content. The Qur’an and some sacred Hadith (Hadith Qudsi) are included in this kind of revelation." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
("The Second is implicit revelation. The essence and gist of this is also based on revelation or inspiration, but its explanation and description were left to the Messenger (UWBP). When he explained and described such revelation, sometimes he again relied on revelation, or on inspiration, or sometimes he spoke in terms of his own insight. When he resorted to his own interpretation, he either relied on the perceptive power given him on account of h..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
110. satır: 110. satır:
'''The First''' is explicit revelation. In this case, the Noble Messenger (Upon whom be blessings and peace) is merely an interpreter and announcer, with no share in the content. The Qur’an and some sacred Hadith (Hadith Qudsi) are included in this kind of revelation.
'''The First''' is explicit revelation. In this case, the Noble Messenger (Upon whom be blessings and peace) is merely an interpreter and announcer, with no share in the content. The Qur’an and some sacred Hadith (Hadith Qudsi) are included in this kind of revelation.


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
'''The Second''' is implicit revelation. The essence and gist of this is also based on revelation  or  inspiration, but its explanation and description were left  to  the Messenger (UWBP). When he explained and described such revelation, sometimes he again relied on revelation, or on inspiration, or sometimes he spoke in terms of his own insight. When he resorted to his own  interpretation, he either relied on the perceptive power given him on account of his prophetic mission, or he spoke as a human being and conformably to  usage, custom and the level of common comprehension.
'''İkinci Kısım:''' “Vahy-i zımnî”dir. Şu kısmın mücmel ve hülâsası, vahye ve ilhama istinad eder fakat tafsilatı ve tasviratı, Resul-i Ekrem aleyhissalâtü vesselâma aittir. O vahiyden gelen mücmel hâdiseyi tafsil ve tasvirde, Zat-ı Ahmediye aleyhissalâtü vesselâm bazen yine ilhama, ya vahye istinad edip beyan eder veyahut kendi ferasetiyle beyan eder. Ve kendi içtihadıyla yaptığı tafsilat ve tasviratı, ya vazife-i risalet noktasında ulvi kuvve-i kudsiye ile beyan eder veyahut örf ve âdet ve efkâr-ı âmme seviyesine göre, beşeriyeti noktasında beyan eder.
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">