İçeriğe atla

Yirmi Birinci Söz/en: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

Yirmi Birinci Söz/en (kaynağı gör)

13.32, 6 Ağustos 2024 tarihindeki hâli

102 bayt eklendi ,  6 Ağustos
"Just as imagining unbelief is not unbelief, neither is fancying unbelief, unbelief. And just as imagining misguidance is not misguidance, so too reflecting on misguidance is not misguidance. For both imagining, and fancying, and supposing, and reflecting, are different from confirmation with the reason and submission of the heart, they are other than them; they are free to an extent; they do not listen to the faculty of will; they are not inclu..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu
GörselVikimetin
("The cure for this wound is as follows:" içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
("Just as imagining unbelief is not unbelief, neither is fancying unbelief, unbelief. And just as imagining misguidance is not misguidance, so too reflecting on misguidance is not misguidance. For both imagining, and fancying, and supposing, and reflecting, are different from confirmation with the reason and submission of the heart, they are other than them; they are free to an extent; they do not listen to the faculty of will; they are not inclu..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
166. satır: 166. satır:
The cure for this wound is as follows:
The cure for this wound is as follows:


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Just as imagining unbelief is not unbelief, neither is fancying unbelief, unbelief. And just as imagining misguidance is not misguidance, so too reflecting on misguidance is not misguidance. For  both  imagining,  and  fancying,  and  supposing,  and  reflecting,  are different from confirmation with the reason and submission of the heart, they are other than them; they are free to an extent; they do not listen to the faculty of will; they are not included among the obligations of religion. But affirmation and submission are not like that; they are dependent on a balance. And just as imagining, fancying, supposing, and reflecting are not  affirmation or submission, so they cannot  be said to be doubt or hesitation. But if they are repeated unnecessarily and become established, then a sort of real doubt may be born of them. Also, continually taking the part of the opposing side calling it unbiased reasoning or being fair reaches the point that the person involuntarily favours the opposing side. His taking the part of the truth, which is incumbent on him, is destroyed. He too falls into danger. A state of mind becomes fixed in his head whereby he becomes an officious representative of Satan or the enemy.
Tahayyül-ü küfür, küfür olmadığı gibi tevehhüm-ü küfür dahi küfür değildir. Tasavvur-u dalalet, dalalet olmadığı gibi tefekkür-ü dalalet dahi dalalet değildir. Çünkü hem tahayyül hem tevehhüm hem tasavvur hem tefekkür; tasdik-i aklîden ve iz’an-ı kalbîden ayrıdırlar, başkadırlar. Onlar bir derece serbesttirler. Cüz-i ihtiyariyeyi pek dinlemiyorlar. Teklif-i dinî altına çok giremiyorlar. Tasdik ve iz’an, öyle değiller. Bir mizana tabidirler. Hem tahayyül, tevehhüm, tasavvur, tefekkür nasıl ki tasdik ve iz’an değiller. Öyle de şüphe ve tereddüt sayılmazlar. Fakat eğer lüzumsuz tekrar ede ede müstekar bir hale gelse o vakit hakiki bir nevi şüphe, ondan tevellüd edebilir. Hem bîtarafane muhakeme namıyla veya insaf namına deyip şıkk-ı muhalifi iltizam ede ede, tâ öyle bir hale gelir ki ihtiyarsız taraf-ı muhalifi iltizam eder. Ona vâcib olan hakkın iltizamı kırılır. O da tehlikeye düşer. Hasmın veya şeytanın bir vekil-i fuzulîsi olacak bir halet, zihninde takarrur eder.
</div>


<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div lang="tr" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
"https://risale.site/index.php/Özel:MobileDiff/143296" sayfasından alınmıştır